I think you mean Ron Paul.

Try saying vote 3rd party.

Good, unless you try and give an opinion on politics.

I get it, I was just leaning into the 90%.

@DrZoidbergYes comes out swinging with insults first. Isn’t the Healthcare system a victim of Governmental regulation?

I’ve seen a $2 and a $100 bill and even had a few, but where’d you get a $1000 bill? I’ve never seen one of those.

Wow, I feel that this is getting personal. All I’m saying is that if people were not taxed roughly 40% of their income, there would be less of a need to look to Government for solutions. The Government is highly inefficient at everything it does and misappropriates our tax dollars, they are not helping anyone but themselves.

People will pay for social supports if they feel inclined to do so. I also think that there would be less need for social supports if people could keep more of their own money. Restriction of education? Have you seen what is being “taught” in schools nowadays? Plus, the expense of higher education is inflated due to Governmental interference also. Public Services would be dictated by the people and what they want to support, rather than an inefficient Government run system.

The fiscal statement has a lot of “other” categories along with many things the Government shouldn’t be involved in anyway.

I think we should have a very limited Government with transparency and accountability of where our money goes. I think we should have a flat tax far less than what we’re are paying now.

People will pay for what they want and I’m not under the assumption that we will ever have zero taxes for public needs. I believe we need to reel in Governmental power and eliminate a lot of the “government funded” programs.

Nice, I love the “Who will build the roads?” argument.

Incorrect, stop worrying about being on the winning side. Vote with your values. Then if it all burns down you can take solace in the fact you voted correctly according to you. Help educate others on voting for a candidate who will get Government out of your house and wallet, Libertarian candidate. Voting for the lesser of two evils is still voting for evil. The only way out is to vote differently. Get enough people to vote differently and change will come. Voters have been brainwashed into thinking there are only two options.

Ok, the problem I see is that Turtle, Snake, Owl, etc. seem to be only worried about being on the “winning” side regardless if the candidate is against their values. They’ve also been victims of Political Propaganda (Negative ads). Each time they vote for the Lesser of Two Evils they are giving conceding a little more and more each time. Get rid of Gerrymandering and replace it with Ranked Choice Voting to eliminate the “Spoiler Effect.” Vote with you conscious and not your desire to Win.

I’ll check it out now.

Main Stream Media.

Believing the MSM is see.

Incorrect, Vote 3rd party and make a difference.

Amazon Basics, that’s hilarious!