It’s such a dumb take too. Let’s look at other things that need time to load: video games. Often times the loading screens tell you nothing about what’s actually going on, but hilariously some say things like “weeding the garden” or “sniffing some glue” or other things to that effect.

“It’s lying to us” is such a… naive take. It’s just spitting out preprogrammed text to essentially say “nothing had gone wrong but we are still working on this.”

*Laughs in blazor*

I mean, it’s dumb but I know what it is. It’s the painter for the internal frame’s title pane maximize button, which is in the internal frames title, which is in the internal frame.

It’s essentially a dumb way of writing: InternalFrame.Title.MaximizeButton.Painter

You’re doing it wrong silly, you charge your butthole with moonlight.

I don’t understand how that can be reliable without being extremely obvious.

Yeah, it’s a problem. You just don’t see it as often yet. A while back there were a large number of communities being blasted by bots, and they would make it into the hot category because nothing else was going on at the time.

That… isn’t at all what is being talked about here.

Honestly you’re just showing your complete lack of knowledge on the topic. Using your logic, downloading a pirated movie and watching it myself, then immediately deleting it, is not copyright infringement.

Despite the fact that it literally is.

I mean, why are you confident the work in textbooks is correct? Both have been proven unreliable, though I will admit LLMs are much more so.

The way you verify in this instance is actually going through the work yourself after you’ve been shown sources. They are explicitly not saying they take 1+1=3 as law, but instead asking how that was reached and working off that explanation to see if it makes sense and learn more.

Math is likely the best for this too. You have undeniable truths in math, it’s true, or it’s false. There are no (meaningful) opinions on how addition works other than the correct one.

Each of those could be seen as anti competitive moves. Just because you want and like the idea, doesn’t mean they would be seen as universally good by all.

I feel like enforcing those would actually lead to them being labeled more of a monopoly.

State your reasoning. Because I’ve seen many developers defending the 30% steam tax.

Individuals will be nigh impossible to properly handle, but a registered business with a known presence on X won’t be difficult at all.

They aren’t saying they will fine for the use of VPNs, but the continued use of X through alternative means.

Those are not mutually exclusive.

The secret chats feature isn’t between anyone I believe, it’s between two people. But I don’t actually know for certain because I’ve not looked into it beyond a cursory googling.

That said, you’d be correct in that just like any service out there, the moment you let random people join there’s no level of encryption that can keep your secrets secret.

To be clear, it’s encrypted*.

* If you enable it

Cloud connected cars are essentially what happens when companies refuse to admit smart phones are superior for 99% of the stuff they want their car to do, and the other 1% is subscription bullshit.

Honestly would be hard to do. There a perfectly legitimate and everyday uses for pretty much everything used in fingerprinting. Taking them away or obscuring them in one way or another would break so much.

Honestly for hiking I’d suggest a power bank with solar charge capability. One thing to charge them all.

Judging buy your less broken English, you may be biased.

It’s almost like everyone has biases. 🤔