I hear it’s something leftists talk about when they don’t want to do things that they associate with being liberal

I don’t mind the content, but this guy starts the video by poisoning the well against himself. At least, when somebody describes using technology to launder drone strikes, that’s what it does to me.

Okay, but did you get to watch Barbenheimer in 2023?

Removed by mod

Fascism abolishes bourgeois democracy without abolishing bourgeois rule itself. […]

Look no further than the capitalist class at the top of the CCP. Its imperialist initiatives. Its reactionary treatment of Muslims, LGBT people, etc.

Inb4 internal propaganda. Nazis say Jews got great swimming pools.

Removed by mod

So in worldnews, being cringe is bannable if it’s against the CCP but not the US.

I also paraphrased an upvoted comment on this subreddit that calls people who call it the CCP a racist Nazi.

And you don’t think orientalism (the real kind) is also racist? That’s a weird nitpick you tried to employ.

If you stalked my comment history, then you’re being extremely selective and disingenuous, or very lazy.

“Death to Amerikkka” is not a critique either. But it is allowed by moderators. Do you condemn that equally?

A political party is not a race.

Death to the CCP.

To quote @davel@lemmy.ml : Reporter, please learn the difference between a people and a state.

According to moderators, even using the word “CCP” makes you a racist orientalist Nazi.

If that sounds like the neolib tactic of calling all criticism of Israel (or even the Netanyahu regime) “antisemitic” that’s because it is.

“Racist” - learn the difference between a state and a race.

Everybody calls the CCP the CCP. This is literally a “Nazis drink water” situation.

Death to the CCP. Death to all other fascist groups.

Anything much outside of the mods’ pro-Russian, pro-CCP, pro-Hamas narrative on /c/worldnews is frequently removed and the user banned. Pro-Western users have a strict bigotry standard applied, while anti-Western users can say anything.

I noticed somebody who wrote “death to amerikkka” was given official mod sanction (saying that it was a country not a people group) so I made the same comment about the CCP.

Comment removed. Banned.

Confirmed.

Are you opposed to authoritarianism?

Asking so I can understand whether the Nazis would get a pass under your beliefs.

I don’t like it when anybody, including Nazis, try to whitewash their actual agenda by putting dishonest labels on top of what they really do.

Removed by mod

Not really interested in seeing another wall of links to further links. Authoritarianism is bad.

Are you implicitly admitting their critiques are 100% correct? Because I read your entire comment with a “you are correct, but…”

BTW this denialism could work for any oppressive regime. Swap “CPC” (the politically correct way to say it) with “Nazi” or their politically correct preferred acronym, “NSDAP”.

Personally, I don’t think fascists get to decide what we call them. It’s the CCP and the Nazis to me. Always will be.

Yea, I have gotten comments removed and banned several times from lemmy.ml for disagreeing with literal and easily disproven Russian propaganda. You don’t even need to be pro anything, just disagreeing with Russia does it.

You think moderators remove those comments? (/s)

Protip: by replying to a comment on many apps, you can see the content of the comment. This can be very useful.

I only played Postal Brain Damaged because I liked 2 so much, and that’s how I found out about boomer shooters to begin with!

As for Postal 4… Would not recommend. Sadly.

The studio that makes those games, makes the best in their genre and is somehow punching above their weight. I got Elderborn too after playing Postal Brain Damaged and was impressed.

Everybody likes different genres, and this one probably wouldn’t be mine, but it was entrancing and I basically immediately poured all my free time into it too. Totally worth the buy.

I’ve watched Fox once in the past year and that’s exactly how they arranged their segments, connecting two loosely related things to push a singular agenda…

… Never saw the AntiWork thing, I just know how it went down.

Even if it never accomplished nothing before the Fox News interview, isn’t it interesting Fox felt the need to confront it?