Nah, he was way more furious when Macron hinted that European leaders should consider sending troops to Ukraine.
Nah, he was way more furious when Macron hinted that European leaders should consider sending troops to Ukraine.
Yes, but there is a quite a gap between ordering tanks and equipment and receiving said order.
South Korean armouries might have to start working overtime soon.
The “Ready Player One” approach might also help.
I have no English sources on hand, but there have been multiple parcels found across Europe that contained firebombs. In one case, the bomb didn’t go off mid-flight because the flight was delayed.
The heads of German intelligence agencies had their annual public hearing recently, making it very clear that Russia considers Germany an enemy. As far as I can tell, the response by our senior political figures has been deafening silence and inaction.
So Putin is not stupid at all. He is just counting on the continued indecisiveness of most western leaders.
During university I gave additional lessons for lower semesters and at times had to juggle three languages: Java, Typescript and plain JavaScript for that one professor who thought TS sucks.
Coding on the spot got really messy at times.
That’s alright as long as I can use the Cyclops instead.
Smoking accidents can happen everywhere! Only YOU can prevent forest fires!
Which alternatives do you recommend?
inb4 Russian state media headline “Ukraine running out of troops. Hiring mercenaries! In other news: Don’t bother about the weirdly speaking comrades from Vladivostok!”
NATO maintains that it is a defensive alliance. If NATO starts adding countries Russia is currently at war with, it becomes an offensive alliance.
I don’t think so. Ukraine is in a defensive war. Actively joining their side doesn’t turn it into an offensive one. The difference between offensive and defensive conflicts is the goal: In an offensive, you want to gain something. In a defence, it is about keeping what you have. Just because NATO would come to their aid, Ukraine wouldn’t want to conquer Russia.
That being said, why wasn’t Ukraine added earlier?
Multiple reasons probably:
Well, that’d be the point of Ukraine joining NATO currently.
It is still open source. However, it is not free software anymore.
I really hope it’s going to be closer to the original than Below Zero.
I liked Below Zero but it wasn’t able to instill the same feeling of dread and anxiety that Subnautica could. Below Zero felt a lot more “child-friendly”.
And for the love of god: Get that Sea Truck out of my sights. I want my Cyclops back!
AT MOST 5 a week and there are also weeks where I receive none at all. Interestingly it always seems to be the same type of spam from different adresses so there is probably a bot net somewhere that has my address and every month or so when the owners start a new wave I get a few and thats it.
On the other hand how many false positives have you had to pick out of the bin?
Well, it was bound to happen at some point.
Many features probably have been investigated by Russia already anyway, since Turkey wrecked a bunch of their Leos in Syria a couple of years ago. But of course, having an intact one gives a lot more options.
[…] the factory where the Leopard 2 resurfaced is far from the front line in Ukraine.
Well, smoking accidents can happen everywhere.
Also, funny to see in the article that hinterland
made it into English as well.
I am using my mail provider’s standard filter and at most I get 5 mails per week that make it through. And that’s with my mail being publicly available on my personal website. Not sure what sort of sites people sign up for, but spam has never been an issue, even away from Google.
I guess someone translated a Chinese figure of speech literally.
But I’m skeptical that this is a cannon fodder battalion.
Any NK soldier that isn’t a technician is effectively cannon fodder in Ukraine. The DRK hasn’t fought an armed conflict since its founding. They may be experts at marching parades, but have no actual combat experience.
Some 90% of Germans support stronger legal protections for animal welfare. That makes the debate more complicated than a simple for or against.
Why? If a law passes with 90% support in a democracy, the other 10% clearly have failed to make reasonable arguments against it. Given that most laws nowadays pass with quite a bit less than that, I fail to see the problem.
Also, if your hobby or business relies on hurting other beings it is not a good hobby/business.
Laws that demand violence to be used in proportion with the danger posed by the individual(s) and damage caused?
Proper checks and balances to enforce said laws?