The poor do not have the ability to manipulate mass quantities of people, the rich do. Because they are rich and have the resources and connections to accomplish this. They buy politicians and manipulate to cause the conditions you describe. If they were not rich, they could not do that.
Blaming the poor for being manipulated is bad faith. And victim blaming is not an effective rallying strategy.
I appreciate that they clarified that “bad” employees aren’t always bad. I very firmly fit into the fourth category listed (avoids looking for jobs because it’s the worst) and would definitely get trapped pretty easily.
It does. I was looking something up and ran face first into a redacted account that once had the answer I needed. I was very conflicted about it.
Very true. I’m behind the US lens on this one so it’s easier to speak from what I experience. I know it’s… bad… elsewhere.
That’s… disingenuous. Lot of stuff happened between those points, including the murder of homosexuals for the crime of existing.
The LGBT community keeps the fight up because complacency gets our rights taken away. Justice Thomas has explicitly stated that gay marriage is on his list of wrongs* to right. To say nothing of Project 2025.
And to trick them into banning ranked choice voting.
Edit: spelling
Best use I’ve had for them (data engineer here) is things that don’t have a specific answer. Need a cover letter? Perfect. Script for a presentation? Gets 95% of the work done. I never ask for information since it has no capability to retain a fact.
There’s an amendment on the ballot here in Missouri to ban non-citizens from voting this year. Also to ban ever adopting ranked choice voting, but it’s really about that non-citizen thing. Totally not ballot candy to do something undemocratic.
If you’re in Missouri, vote no on amendment 7 please.
You mean Twitter?
Bodybuilding and powerlifting would like a word.
My satisfaction
Ow. What did I do to you?!
Sovereign citizen. People who think the law is magic, and also not at all what it is as printed. They think if they string enough legal references together, they don’t have to pay taxes, have a magic clone of themselves that accrues debt for them and other equally insane bullshit.
Ok fair, that misinterpretation is on me.
I feel like both of us have lost our minds with what a dumb thread this is.
I’m allowed to strongly associate two groups of people who I’ve found to have similar patterns of behavior. You’re allowed to dislike me for having an opinion you dislike.
Or you’re a real AI whom I’ve offended and for which I apologize. That’d be a fun end to this nonsense.
You imply I am a grifter? Quite the stretch. I’m curious how you got there. A vague reference to my profession brands me as such?
Sure. And the right thing is not tolerating grifters.
Yup. I’m ok with having a negative, poorly backed opinion of grifters who’s lies fall in to my area of professional expertise. And if one of those grifters get butthurt about it, all the better. If they didn’t want to be offended by people not liking their bullshit, they shouldn’t be active detriments to society at large.
Someone posted a follow up elsewhere. He did in fact mean it that way.