“only one person per file”
so we’ve reverted back to the rcs/cvs days?
“only one person per file”
so we’ve reverted back to the rcs/cvs days?
oh my god this is brilliant. what if that’s the traveler’s whole secret purpose after all: he’s always been a Q that recruits people into the continuum in a much different way than our Q tries to?
the people would stay, just one of them would be informing the other that neither are real
would have preferred “we’re not people” on this one
look i’m just gonna say it
i would have fucked that ghost too
oh boy someone’s crossing the streams
some programmer somewhere arbitrarily chose a number that they felt sounded reasonable
yeah this post is not ok.
celebrate your journey, but don’t force it on others.
you never crack anyone else’s egg. ever.
Did you miss the words “dark pattern”? it is a term for when companies misuse/abuse UX principles to trick people into acting against their own best interests. In this case, the bold “click me” looking button in the screenshots means “yes daddy, spank me and then sell my data to your friends”, which is the option that most people who see that box won’t want to click.
Unfortunately, a large swath of the general population are trained in their brains to “click ok to make it go away”. These UX decisions take advantage of those people.
Assumedly, the grayed out box will also not dismiss the banner, but instead lead to a more complicated experience where you then are forced to drill down into complicated options to decide which of the cookies to set, which will be confusing if you didn’t open the link at top in a new tab to cross reference which of the 27 data brokers “Technology Partners” to decide which.
It’s not UX, it’s abusive UI and the very definition of malicious compliance to EU regulations.
that still contradicts pictrs breaking the thumbnail
i always hated that the us version of this show felt like they needed to say this explicitly, that was one of the best things about the british version is that the points were a cute little joke that didn’t need to be spelled out
this one hurts
and now the theme is stuck in my head
having is less annoying way of not doing needless/bug-prone repetition. if you select someCalculatedValue(someInput) as lol
you can add having lol > 42
in mysql, whereas without (ie in pgsql) you’d need to do where someCalculatedValue(someInput) > 42
, and make sure changes to that call stay in sync despite how far apart they are in a complex sql statement.
most languages have some first or third party lib that implements a query builder
i didn’t crack til 42
General deep dives on random topics:
stuff about the animal world:
linguistics and how we communicate:
You just apply anyway.
Usually they’re not willing to pay anywhere close to doctorate money for doctorates anyway, and will end up settling no matter who they pick.
I’m not sure if i’ve ever known any engineer who has met the listed job requirements for their role. They say requirements, but what they mean is “this is my ideal”. Put another way: think of it like a dating app profile. dude may act like he only dates 10s in his profile, but you show him some attention and suddenly you’re just as good as a 10, because he’s lonely and needs affection from someone.
Basically, for most companies, they’re essentially the corporate version of incels. Way too high of standards, but will settle for anyone who is into them regardless of what they think their standards are, because they just need someone ASAP, and their standards disappear quickly once you make yourself available.
I’ve enjoyed a 20+ year long career as a programmer, and I dropped out of college 3 months in because i couldn’t afford it. That’s because early in my career i took a few shitty jobs until i had a decent enough resume that i didn’t have to take shitty jobs anymore. That took study and practice and passion in programming, but i did that for fun years before i even showed up on the university doorstep.
Fork bomb is actually a pretty fantastic cat name