• 0 Posts
  • 40 Comments
Joined 10 months ago
cake
Cake day: December 26th, 2023

help-circle


  • rwhitisissle@lemy.loltoGaming@lemmy.worldPeak graphic design
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    You mean the console or the shape of its logo? Because those are different things. This is a discussion purely centered around graphic design for a gaming system’s logo. The graphic could be literally anything else and it wouldn’t change the console or its games. It’s like having a community dedicated to books and discussing those books and someone posting a picture of bookends, saying “look at these cool book bookends.” If someone said “that doesn’t have much to do with books” they would be (generally) right. It’s probably off topic for the intended subject matter of the community, in addition to being not very interesting. You might think that the logos for consoles is perfectly valid as a topic of discussion. In which case, great. Happy for you. I don’t agree and I elected to state that opinion.


  • rwhitisissle@lemy.loltoGaming@lemmy.worldPeak graphic design
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    4 months ago

    And yet multiple people have managed to make responses.

    Yes, and their responses are either equally vapid or are things like “Wait until they hear about the FedEx logo.” My initial response was critical of the underlying nature of the post, and I would argue that this conversation we are having right now, is substantially better than any conversation being had about the logo itself. So I guess I did have something to add to the conversation, otherwise (wait for it) you wouldn’t have bothered responding to me. Would you?






  • rwhitisissle@lemy.loltoGaming@lemmy.worldPeak graphic design
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    16
    ·
    4 months ago

    I mean, it’s not disqualified from being art just because the artist got paid by a corporation.

    Please quote me where I said that it was.

    But yeah the fact that this is a product branding logo has weird “hail corporate” vibes.

    That and the fact that the observation itself is somewhat facile.




  • Google does not have a monopoly on search. Bing / DuckDuckGo works just fine.

    Around 82% of search engine requests are issued through Google. Bing around 10%. I don’t know if we just have differing definitions of “monopoly,” but Google is the default on all Android devices, almost every non-Microsoft browser, and probably on Apple products as well. And most users don’t know enough or care enough to ever change from that.



  • As a huge Star Wars fan I can confirm that I absolutely loathe Star Wars. Not for being “woke,” mind you, but for just being generally creatively bankrupt, poorly executed, and with new media for it effectively held hostage by the existing media for it. Which is why I don’t watch any of the t.v. shows or movies anymore. In my opinion this is a superior alternative to getting online and filling my diaper in the “user reviews” section of Rotten Tomatoes.



  • rwhitisissle@lemy.loltolinuxmemes@lemmy.worldI am the outwitter!
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 months ago

    Not sure why you were enabling HTTPS for a project that was not hosting an internet-accessible service, really. By which I assume you mean the service doesn’t have a publicly accessible web based UI or API component. What were you trying to access and how? The only scenario I could think of for this would be that your custom software relies on HTTPS for secure communication within its own internal network (such as on a VPN) to send sensitive data back and forth between services. In which case that feels like overkill for a college course, since you shouldn’t have any genuinely sensitive data that you need to secure if it’s just for testing and demonstration.