that’s stupid
that’s stupid
I wonder if it’s another missionary
I love how you go from ‘guns are just tools’ to ‘I think about fighting all the time’ in like three sentences. I’ve had guns, I used to be a member of the NRA, I’m also not a dipshit who thinks a gun is just as much a tool as a hammer is. They’re designed to kill things, it’s not weak to admit that’s what they’re for.
A gun is a tool with only one use.
I bet it’s ‘unsinkable’
Dukat had more likable moments than Huffman.
I think all that would happen is billionaires would pay people to be their ‘front’ character and somehow find a way to monetize it on the down-low.
Dumb question: what’s a mind map? i’ve heard of it, and seen some examples, but still have no real idea what one is for.
Can’t trust these companies to do what’s right.
This has to be drilled into the collective consciousness as much as possible. There is no such thing as an ethical corporation, or an ethical company that is for-profit – they simply cannot be ethical, they are amoral by design. If Target or Walmart or Netflix do something that is seen as positive, the only reason is a profit motive, not because they are moving towards being ‘good’.
I must be in the minority here, I turned off sub-specific CSS as soon as I could.
are you going to be biking in water deeper than 1500 ft?
of course the top reply is some nft bullshit
"might only provide ‘milliseconds’
“Don’t give me your mumbo-jumbo Mister Scientist - will the alarm go off or not?!”
Fry: How many atmospheres can the ship withstand?
Professor: Well, it’s a spaceship, so I’d say anywhere between zero and one.
in fairness, the title said “how”, not why
I mean this completely apolitically - has anyone ever seen Hunter Biden and Jordan Peterson in the same place at the same time?
They don’t actually care about the law. Hunter Biden is only useful to them as something to deflect and waste air complaining about, they don’t actually want anything to happen to him legally and they don’t care about principle.
A more charitable interpretation is that the text that people thought would best train ChatGPT tended to be thoughtful and well-written posts like yours. Maybe you don’t write like ChatGPT, but ChatGPT writes like you.
That doesn’t even matter, they will literally use anything as ammunition. There isn’t a “more” or “less” convincing set of arguments they use to make their point, they just say a lot of things all the time and go with what seems to stick.