“People who say murder is bad are exactly the same as people saying being gay is bad because both say something is bad.” You are very smart.
“People who say murder is bad are exactly the same as people saying being gay is bad because both say something is bad.” You are very smart.
Never thought about that, but I guess you could easily create circular reasoning with two or more publications citing each other?
Constant whining is basically a national sport in Germany. Yes, there are way too many poor and homeless people here too, but the ones crying the loudest are mostly middle class people who are financially secure. Its either that their neighbour has a bigger car or they blame society that no one likes them.
Exactly, explaining something again and again In the same way and expecting that somehow it will begin to work is so goddamn stupid. Obviously if one angle doesn’t work you have to try a different one.
My comment was more on the original post. You can’t just switch the content of a point because another one is made in a similar way and say it’s basically the same. Guess i got cautious with all the “Climate change activists are like a religious cult” arguments. Just because two groups are advocating strongly for something doesn’t mean one of cant have good arguments and the other one isnt full of shit. That being said, I agree that not willing to compromise to a certain degree or aim for intermediate goals is stupid and not productive.