It’s not redundant. Harms compound. It’s not like people max out their carcinogenic index or something. 🙄
It’s not redundant. Harms compound. It’s not like people max out their carcinogenic index or something. 🙄
not worse than booze.
is not doing your argument any favors.
It would be a different AI though. So you can do that with people…
Your have to be rich yourself to get away with reading the rich.
I don’t remember seeing a guy running for Congress that promised he’d prevent huge corporations from running rough shod over everything.
What we need is ranked voting so someone like that might have a chance on the ballot.
Maybe “something” = “at high risk of getting stick?”
Tracking skills would also have to be part of the arsenal, otherwise something could just run far enough fast enough that we couldn’t find it, despite our endurance.
The free will myth is especially damaging, as it steers people away from pragmatic solutions and towards blame and punitive policies.
I think I’m you just mean T. What’s an LGB surgury?
It would be nice if lemmy had the same level of niche communities as Reddit. That requires large total numbers I think.
Autonomous cats are now common in a couple of cities. No reason to think it won’t expand to more. Why not LA?
More likely, one person spent time and effort, and someone else spent money.
Using the correct title would have made clear that it wasnt referring to the flatulence of the eater though. 🤔
Or maybe the number bus and tram lines increased, and the train systems expanded. “One person, one car” is a mentality we should all be saying “fuck that” to.
Public transit and shared autonomous car usage.
Less cars, more trees, more happiness.
I see a cylinder bit an obelisk.
The first line in the article says a “new study.” So are you sure it’s not this paper? Also, have to say the paper title is kind of a duh moment.
Why not to everyone’s front door?