• lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    3 days ago

    The most unlogical thing. If it starts at 12 AM, the next hour is 1 PM, right?
    I prefer midnight and noon, or a 24h clock.

      • lnxtx (xe/xem/xyr)@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 days ago

        I mean when looking at numbers:

        . . . . . .
        1100pm 1159pm 1200am 1259am 0100am
        1100am 1159am 1200pm 1259pm 0100pm
        230024h 235924h 000024h 005924h 010024h
        110024h 115924h 120024h 125924h 130024h

        Too much confusion.

        Even NIST (National Institute of Standards and Technology in the US) suggests:

        To avoid ambiguity, specification of an event as occurring on a particular day at 11:59 p.m. or 12:01 a.m. is a good idea, especially legal documents such as contracts and insurance policies. Another option would be to use 24-hour clock, using the designation of 0000 to refer to midnight at the beginning of a given day (or date) and 2400 to designate the end of a given day (or date).

        • Successful_Try543@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          2 days ago

          I didn’t want to imply that the use of the 12 hour system should be prefered in any way. Just that the division into AM and PM follows some logic. Its just the numbering 12, 1, 2,… that’s weird.

    • neatchee@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      3 days ago

      “midnight” and “noon” for sure.

      … And now I’m thinking about all those super heros and villains named “midnight” and their logical counter-characters “noon”