downhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agothis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialimagemessage-square16fedilinkarrow-up1604arrow-down111
arrow-up1593arrow-down1imagethis meme goes from acute to obtuse real quickmidwest.socialdownhomechunk@midwest.social to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 1 year agomessage-square16fedilink
minus-squareKidplayer_666@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down1·1 year agoAlso, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
minus-squareTonyTonyChopper@mander.xyzlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·1 year agowhat about the number whose square is -1
minus-squarenomecks@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·1 year agoRoses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
minus-square⸻ Ban DHMO 🇦🇺 ⸻@aussie.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-222 days agodeleted by creator
minus-squareaffiliate@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down1·1 year agoas far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.) what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary
Also, all numbers are rational, otherwise they do not make sense
what about the number whose square is -1
Roses are red, Euhler’s a hero, e^iπ+1=0
You’re just imagining it
deleted by creator
as far as the rationals are concerned, this is the same as the number whose square is 2. (ℚ(i) and ℚ(√2) are isomorphic as fields.)
what we can gleam from this is that complete rationality can blur the line between what’s real and what’s imaginary