Title

    • Michaelmitchell@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Meta does not want to “consume the fediverse” , it’s not worth it. Threads has been up for a day and it already has 10x the number of active users than mastodon. Mastodon and the fediverse as it currently stands, is a blip compared to instagram and Twitter. They’re doing activitypub so they can claim there’s a free market and avoid any anti-trust litigation for owning the three largest social media platforms. If that means a relatively small number of people stay on mastodon instead of threads that’s a small price to pay.

      • starlinguk@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        People keep saying “threads should join Mastodon because then the famous people will join it.”

        I don’t want Trump and Tate on Mastodon, thanks. I don’t want all the bigots on Mastodon, thanks. I don’t want millions of people on Mastodon, thanks.

        I love how it’s like the “old internet” when it was about discussing your interests, not about influencers.

    • xthedeerlordx@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      “There are rumours that Meta would become “Fediverse compatible”. You could follow people on Instagram from your Mastodon account”

      Are there examples of this? Or is this just the fear? This all seems like a knee jerk reaction to something we are already avoiding by being on Lemmy/mastodon. The point of having decentralized instances isn’t popularity. It’s to avoid the corporate bullshit, which is inherently less popular.

      • Spaceman Spiff@lemmy.fmhy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        If any instance becomes large enough to have an undue influence, which Meta would likely have, then they effectively control the entire ecosystem. At that point, it effectively stops being decentralized (See: The 51% Attack, although this wouldn’t happen at a certain number/ratio). When it becomes convenient to them, they can pull the plug, and destroy the rest of the ecosystem that isn’t theirs.

        It’s exactly what happened with XMPP and Google Talk.

          • Terrasque@infosec.pub
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            XMPP was and still is a buggy mess, and the reason Google unlinked it was that while it had a fraction of the legit traffic, it was like 80% of trolling and spam and other crap.

            And Google killed xmpp? No, xmpp killed xmpp, if you can kill something that’s already dead.

            People started using other networks because they got used to

            1. Messages arriving
            2. Messages being readable by the recipient
            3. Media like images actually being shown properly.

            With xmpp messages frequently got lost with no error, different clients having different encryption and encoding settings, different ways to encode and decode media… A complete mess.

            People using that as an EEE example are clueless, or stupid.

            Also, if meta starts federating, it will eventually stop it for the same reason Google stopped talking with other xmpp servers. Because it’ll be the source of most of the crap, but very little legit content.

          • ErwinLottemann@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, because it was a decentralized messaging protocol, like ActivityPub. The problem in the end was not the ‘OG’ XMPP Users but the new Google Talk users and how Google treated the protocol. This, theoretically, could happen with ‘the fediverse’, too.

        • Michaelmitchell@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Except it doesn’t work and no corporation does it any more because it doesn’t. Look at the two main examples, internet browsers and email. Both of them remain open platforms with viable foss alternatives because google knows that doing this sort of stuff will get them in trouble with anti-trust suits.

    • CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m not sure I totally buy the conclusion here. It might have been the goal, but Google Talk or whatever died too.

      If EEE is the end game, what can we do to fight back? Universal defederation probably isn’t going to happen.

      • clutchmatic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Google stuff generally dies quietly due to Google’s corporate attention deficit in running product lines.

        Meta, on the other hand, is sleazy but full of determination.

    • LightProtector@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Just wondering, how does that affect other instances? The whole point of the fediverse is that it’s decentralized.

      • nogooduser@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I could see that it would cause a problem if half the content came from one instance and then that instance de-federated.

        People might move to that instance to join the communities that they were previously following which could reduce the content on other instances as they would probably only use one main account.

        Lots of coulds, mights and maybes there though.

      • Vex_Detrause@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Instances had problems with just people signing-up. Imagine Meta’s server farms federate. Everything is smooth and bug free on Threads. “Sign up on Threads” because it’s a convenient and smooth experience. Imagine the smaller instances loosing users. Now when Threads has lots of users they will decide to stop federating. They will take all their user with them.

  • odium@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Threads will be part of the fediverse. This means that thread users can interact with Lemmy, Mastodon, and Kbin users.

    There will be a huge number of thread users, it will probably quickly become the largest part of the fediverse.

    Some people think that threads users will migrate to other fediverse applications and help the fediverse. Other people think that fediverse users will migrate to threads since it will have more features and the fediverse will die if threads defederates from everything.

    • Howl@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I understand the sentiment, but it seems like a bad take to assume that because a corporate entity produces an app that can interface with the Fediverse then it will kill the Fediverse.

      If Threads has some features that draw people’s attention then it should serve as a guide to help the TPA developers set course for future features.

  • pachrist@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There’s a lot of anxiety because it’s topical. Nearly ever user here I’d wager, myself included, just flipped to Lemmy as we watched Reddit break the camel’s back.

    I think what most people don’t quite realize though is why this is happening. Reddit isn’t just gearing up for an IPO, they’re transitioning to the model spearheaded by Apple: you access their ecosystem exclusively through their platform.

    Every large tech company is trying to play this game. They are developing hardware that gives sole access to their platform which in turn controls the experience and distribution of their content. Apple is best at it and massively profitable, but everyone is trying it. Most already have the software>>>content pipeline locked down, it’s the hardware they can’t get right.

    That being said, Meta understands that the easiest way to grow Threads is to flip Instagram and Facebook users, not Mastadon users. The easiest way to keep users is not some defederation long con, it’s to get your grandma and your spouse on their platform. The goal for Meta is to reach a critical mass tipping point, where as a society, most people agree you just have to have an account through them to be part of a larger conversation. They aren’t trying to kill federalized platforms directly, because it’s easier to skip that step and try to make every platform that isn’t their own second tier at best. It’s in their best interest to ignore everyone else and just on-board as much of their Instagram and Facebook base as possible in the next year.

      • pachrist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’d guess it’s purely to avoid litigation from Twitter. If they didn’t poach Twitter employees or IP, and instead based some of their platform on open source, fediverse stuff, that’s not a multiyear lawsuit with hundreds of millions in lawyer fees.

  • redditcunts@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because it’s going to be better than this place in a week and the folks in lemmy right now are the typical privacy zealots.

    They are frightened at threads being more successful.

    • Kichae@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      No one is frightened of Threads being “more successful”. It’s an Instagram spinoff, it’s obviously going to be successful.

      People who are here don’t want to be sending their data to Meta. That’s it. That’s the whole issue. Many of us are here specifically because we don’t want to voulunatairly hand our IP and usage data to these companies anymore.

      Why are you wasting your time here shitting on this space? You don’t need to be here. You clearly don’t want to be here.

      Go home.