So I was wondering, what is exactly the use case of owning a server rack with huge CPUs and 256GB of DDR4 RAM with 1PB of storage?

Obviously, I’m kind of exaggerating here, but it does seem that most homelabs are big server racks with at least two CPUs and like 20 cores in total.

Why would I want to buy a server rack with all the bells and whistles when a low-power, small NAS can do the trick? What’s the main advantage of having a huge server, compared to an average Synology NAS for example?

Honestly, I only see disadvantages tbh. It consumes way more power, costs way more money and the processing power it provides is probably only relevant for (small) businesses and not for an individual like me.

So, convince me. Why should I get a homelab instead of a regular NAS?

  • poVoq@slrpnk.net
    24·
    10 months ago

    but it does seem that most homelabs are big server racks with at least two CPUs and like 20 cores in total.

    That’s just the people that post a lot online about it.

    And these racks usually start with “I found this super cheap rack server on eBay” and not an actual need.

    • SpeakinTelnet@sh.itjust.works
      2·
      10 months ago

      Yep, my homelab started with a laptop (includes a ups!) And as the years went on I build larger and larger. Now that I manage a full rack, I miss my laptop.

    • Chahk@beehaw.org
      2·
      9 months ago

      And these racks usually start with “I found this super cheap rack server on eBay” and not an actual need.

      Hey! I resemble that!