alt-text

Social Media Post:
Star Trek fans have held the national stereotype of being way too rabid about things for decades but they’re probably the nicest fan base in all of science fiction and the one least likely to have a large faction of them absolutely lose it over a torpedo being fired by a woman or dumb shit like that

Source (login walled)

  • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    5 months ago

    I don’t think anyone cares about a torpedo being fired by a woman

    What people do care about is continuity, at least trying to keep characters consistent, good stories, etc.

    Hence why most of the nu-trek shows and movies are such utter crap, as it’s CGI over story while completely ignoring 50 years of history.

    Picard show, for example… Beverly crusher who once disobeyed a direct.order to save a victim after a bombing attack, who made a point about being peaceful is now a ninja assassin. Seven of nine, who made a point about improving, being better, now is a mad mass murderer who wants revenge for everything. Picard, who once was thoughtful, highly intelligent and respected, is now a bumbling old man.

    Star trek which once was about being better is now about fuck fuck fuckerdy fuck fuck fuck because that’s star trek now, man, get with the program, it’s cool man!

    I can go on for hours about Picard, let’s not. Discovery is somehow even worse. Those movies where they just did older movies again but now with new! And! Improved! CGI! CGI CGI CGI! Lense flaaaaaaaare!

    With TNG I so could imagine living there on one of those star ships. Nu trek crap ships are just … I don’t even know where to begin

    Add a broody darkness over that with regular over the top violence, and yeah, we really have star trek!

    Long live the Orville, the new star trek

    • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      I don’t think most NuTrek is utter crap. Some is written for me, some isn’t.

      SNW and Lower Decks are some of my favorite Trek.

      Continuity doesn’t matter too much to me, just how the shows make me feel. TOS threw continuity out the window within the first few episodes when they introduced time travel.

      Also, if you expect someone to be the same person, fictional or not, 30 years later into their life, you haven’t lived long enough. The person who is the same human they were twenty years ago, is someone who has wasted twenty years of their life.

      Times change. The new shows have brought in a lot of new fans. That’s not a bad thing. Maybe instead of getting angry that new stuff isn’t made with your tastes in mind, watch something you enjoy instead.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        If style and continuity doesn’t matter for you then fine, let them make their shoe exactly how they want it to be, but don’t use the star trek name as an bait and switch advertising stunt. If you want to call it star trek, let it BE star trek. Nu trek movies are a horribly bad made rehash of the earlier movies all focussed on CGI and pew pew. The shows are dark and broody crap, the animated shows were skipped after seeing how awful the trailers were. Star trek is done.

        • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          You’re responding to a comment from a month ago.

          Style and continuity in Star Trek has been varied ever since the original movies and TNG.

          If you want to hate something, fine. You do you. Waste time and energy being angry about a fictional franchise and move on with your life.

          But don’t think that your stance of “I don’t like it” holds any weight to the people that do.

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            Yeah, inrespond late. Blame the connect app for that, responding is hard.

            In any case, my stance is not “I don’t like it”, that would be the summary of it. It’s much moroe than that, which I already wrote.

            • Dadd Volante@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 months ago

              You’re responding almost a month later again. Get a better app.

              And yes. That is your stance. You said a bunch of things you don’t like. None of which are objective truths, just opinions.

              This is beyond dumb and I’m not responding anymore. Touch grass.

    • ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Your rhetoric is out of date, Strange New Worlds is great and IMO Lower Decks is too, even as someone that hates DISCO and Picard.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Its not out of date, I simply stopped caring and watching. Star trek sucked since after enterprise. I’ve watched the horrendous movies, I’ve watched the cringe shows they showed down our throats all the way to Picard which managed to ruin TNG for me. Can’t even watch that anymore without remembering how badly they broke everything.

        So I’m done

          • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I know. Don’t care anymore. All the high praises you’re giving now were also given for every season of Picard… okay okay! Season one, which we praised into the heavens, was a dud, but this one, season 2, this one will be IT! Aaaaannddd it sucked donkey balls… but okay, season 3 then, will be the best evah!

            Same crap with Discovery before that

            Same crap with the god godawful movies

            I’m done

    • pantyhosewimp@lemmynsfw.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      Billionaire overlords are only funding dystopian sci-fi so that we see the evil society they plan to foist on us as inevitable. Utopian scifi like TNG is revolutionary.

    • Steve@communick.news
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      5 months ago

      That seems like an awfully judgmental rant, for a thread about how nice Star Trek fans are.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Your comment makes me wonder if you read any of it at all.

        Pre 2000 trek is awesome, wholesome, makes you think. It wasn’t just inclusive, it made you think about why inclusivity is good. It hasd graat stories and great entertainment to keep you in. It had designs that made you feel like you could really live there.

        New trek is “WE HAVE A GAY COUPLE AT THE SHOW LOOK AT US!” Whilst the stories, characters , and designs are beyond horrid. Canon is toilet paper in that you wipe your behind with it.

        But if anyone points this out, you get your comments at best, or at worst you get immediately banned, made out to be a nazi, sexist or more of that sort of fun.

        Im sure Picard would have a word or two to say about virtue signalling, but current trek fans don’t really seem to care much.

    • Optional@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      Yeah Discovery was way too dark for me. My trek has a good time all the time.

      Agreed about The Orville - the greatest homage to get cheap sets and great scriptwriting down. Also all other planets are the California woods.

      • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Figuratively but also literally. What happened with just normal plain lighting where you can see things, you know, like places where we work and live?

        No, everything has to look dark and broody and scary