For example, buildings and houses more than a hundred years old keep getting more and more rare, and often have an aesthetic that stands out, more ornate or with a particular style that most people can’t afford today or that is not financially convenient etc. But back in the day, that’s how things were built and most people didn’t put much thought into it.

Another example, illustrations for advertisements ( either billboards or magazines). Up until the 60s (declining from the 70s onwards) a lot of ads had hand drawn illustrations, which required a lot of skill and talent to make. Yet people took them for granted, it was the standard quality of illustration for ads.

So the question is, are we currently mass producing something that will be seen in a similar light in a couple of generations? Thoughts?

  • pingveno@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 months ago

    The battery issue isn’t just in devices that go obsolete. It is also in devices like bike lights where the original functionality never changes. And even in devices like a smartphone, phone battery life often drops off far before the useful life ends.

    • Mothra@mander.xyzOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      5 months ago

      Yes, that’s what I’m getting at, the useful life of the device isn’t over but for most people is more convenient to just replace it.