I recently saw a comment chain about nuclear bombs, and that led me to thinking about this. Say there is a nuclear explosion in the downtown of my US city. I survive relatively fine, but obviously the main part of the city has been destroyed, while major zones extending from the center were also badly damaged. What would be a good response to (a) survive and (b) help out the recovery effort?

  • volvoxvsmarla @lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Thank you for the clip! I once found the show on youtube by accident, it is such a gem. It all started with the cabbage feud. (But I have come to notice that James Acaster only tells true stories, alas.)

    I absolutely don’t get the point system though but nevermind.

    • NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      5 months ago

      I never tried to keep track, but I always assumed each correctly identified lie/truth gets a point, and each mistake gives a point to the other team. Keep in mind that the show gets edited down and you don’t see everything that the audience did, while the score probably includes those things you didn’t see.

      But like, absolutely no one watches this show for the score, so who cares? It might as well be QI’s scoring system :)