• Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        Because we don’t vote based on agreement but on “people should or shouldn’t see this.”

      • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        3 months ago

        It also has downvotes. And as @avidamoeba@lemmy.ca says, this isn’t Reddit. Up- and down-votes are not a popularity contest.

        • federal reverse@feddit.orgM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 months ago

          Now it does. When I came, it stood at 8 upvotes.

          And while I expressed myself badly, the reason I downvoted is: I think it’s largely a bad take and I suspect there must be a more reasonable take on the finance union available somewhere.

          • CaptObvious@literature.cafe
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            3 months ago

            I don’t entirely disagree, and you may be right about the financial union. I’ve also downvoted this post because I think it’s a waste of space that no one should waste time on – unless they need even more convincing that Axel Springer is garbage. I was originally surprised at such a biased piece from Politico, largely because I forgot that they were sold out to Axel Springer.