A notice from X (formerly Twitter) stating: 'Block is changing soon. If your posts are set to public, accounts you have blocked will be able to view them, but they will not be able to engage. For more control over who can see your posts, you can still protect your account.' There is an 'OK' button at the bottom of the notice.

  • X is telling users that blocking will soon be useless and trolls and stalkers will soon be able to see their posts again.
  • Instead of blocking, X advises that users take their account private, the antithesis to what X and its progenitor Twitter was about.
  • This removal of blocking may violate Apple and Google’s policies regarding platforms that host user generated content.
  • ContrarianTrail@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    2 hours ago

    So even after this update, the block feature on Twitter is still more effective than it is on Lemmy, yet nobody seems to be complaining about that.

  • Dr. Wesker@lemmy.sdf.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    45
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Having an X account is in no way, shape, or form a necessity. Imagine thinking you need to participate in the toxic, mainstream socialsphere.

  • Vaggumon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    ·
    8 hours ago

    I protected myself by deleting Twitter the day douche nozzle took over because I’m not a fucking moron.

  • acosmichippo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    8 hours ago

    Instead of blocking, X advises that users take their account private, the antithesis to what X and its progenitor Twitter was about.

    so basically remove your voice from the public sphere, giving the platform fully to the trolls and bullies.

    This will also majorly affect professionals who must use twitter publicly for their job. Reporters, artists, PR people, etc. - they have all had to block abusive users over the years, so I think this may finally push them away to other platforms.

    • pycorax@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      8 hours ago

      Not to mention the change that makes it no longer possible to opt out of being used for AI training. A lot of artists are now jumping ship to blue sky.

    • sunzu2@thebrainbin.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      8 hours ago

      This will also majorly affect professionals who must use twitter publicly for their job. Reporters, artists, PR people, etc.

      You either gonna regime whore or you ain’t got a job… Telling you when they killed tupac and biggie that was about the beginning of the end and now we here🤡

      Get an OF account ?

  • cmnybo@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    8 hours ago

    That’s the same way it works on the fediverse. You post something publicly and anyone can see it regardless of whether you block them or not.

    • EatATaco@lemm.ee
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      27 minutes ago

      Yeah but this is musk and we hate him so this is obviously a very bad terrible idea and omg how can anyone still be on Twitter after this…but don’t mind that I’m posting this on a site where the block does even less.

  • LostXOR@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 hours ago

    Is that a problem? You could already just view their posts without an account, or create a burner account. Might be a hot take, but I think someone with a public account shouldn’t expect to be able to hide it from specific people.

    • Chozo@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 hours ago

      I don’t think Twitter lets you view posts without being logged in anymore. Or at least, it’ll show you old posts, only.

      • LostXOR@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        7 hours ago

        You may be right, seems like it only shows you posts by number of likes. But a burner account is nearly effortless to create anyways.

        • vzq@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          6 hours ago

          I mean, yes. But:

          1. Nearly effortless is not the same as effortless
          2. it’s more evidence that X caters more to the blockees than the blockers.
          • EatATaco@lemm.ee
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            20 minutes ago

            it’s more evidence that X caters more to the blockees than the blockers.

            I’m not sure I agree. However, even if it’s true, I’m not sure it’s such a bad thing. If you’re saying something in public and I’m not even allowed to hear it, let alone respond to it, because you blocked me, you have an effective tool to shut down any dissent. This is what I saw on reddit all the time, there were posters who would block anyone who disagreed with them and so the comments sections on their posts would become very skewed.

            And just the other day, I said that David Duke endorsing Jill Stein doesn’t mean Jill Stein approves of David Duke or anything he stands for. Someone accused me of defending David Duke, and when I pointed out that his was fantasy, they blocked me. So I see people blocking for bullshit reasons all the time.

            Lemmy is much the same, even less restrictive because you don’t even have to log in to see anything. It’s better this way.

  • DogPeePoo@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    5 hours ago

    There is nothing behind those eyes. Looks like an empty vessel with an over soaked ketamine brain.