As Trump assembles a team of pro-war hardliners, concerns grow in Caracas that the administration could pursue military action against Venezuela, including an Iraq-style invasion., Erik Prince Venezuela, Juan Guaidó parallel government, Marco Rubio Secretary of State, Operation Gideon Bay of Piglets, Trump Venezuela policy, U.S. intervention in Venezuela, Venezuela BRICS alliance, Venezuela sanctions impact, Venezuela U.S. relations, Venezuelan civilian militias,
  • Mr_Blott@feddit.uk
    814·
    11 days ago

    Huge amounts of low quality websites being posted here now. I’ve never heard of Mint Press news so I looked them up -

    Detailed Report

    Reasoning: Propaganda, Conspiracies, Pseudoscience, Poor Sources, Failed Fact Checks

    Bias Rating: FAR LEFT (-9.1)

    Factual Reporting: LOW (7.8)

    Country: USA

    MBFC’s Country Freedom Rank: MOSTLY FREE

    Media Type: Website Traffic/Popularity: Medium Traffic

    MBFC Credibility Rating: LOW CREDIBILITY

    • merthyr1831@lemmy.mlEnglish
      14·
      11 days ago

      🤓☝️ uh ackchually my media aggregator website says your website is bad!

      If you want to be a redditor so bad go back to reddit

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      7·
      10 days ago

      Critical thinking is too difficult, so its best to let zionist bloggers tell you what’s factual. /s

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      5·
      10 days ago

      Mintpress is one of the best sites for independent journalism, Pulitzer winner Chris Hedges constantly contributes and Alan MacLeod does amazing investigative work.

      Not their fault you think doing stenography for the State Department and naming “anonymous sources” is as far as good journalism goes. Keep to your corporate propaganda washing and let the rest of us actually read and check the evidence.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.mlEnglish
      4·
      10 days ago

      MBFC is the lowest quality website around: literally just some random right wing jerk offs opinion. Yet liberals treat it like unquestionable holey scripture because it confirms their bias

    • Samsuma@lemmy.ml
      3·
      11 days ago

      Here’s an exercise for you that may require critical thinking (which evidently, you seem very averse to): Can you list out things that are invalid, dishonest and/or blatantly false in the article? Ensure to quote the parts that fit this category of “invalid, dishonest and/or false” and justify why, while citing sources that you believe to not be in this category.

      • Grapho@lemmy.ml
        4·
        10 days ago

        If anglos actually wanted to read and check sources they wouldn’t go for factuality meter websites lmao